iPod Touch 16GB vs iPod Classic 160GB
For some of you this might be a tough choice, for others a now brainer. If you like funky technology (like I do), would you prefer to have the state-of-the-art multi-touch display, or would you go for 10 times more storage?
Technical Specification
| Tech Spec | iPod Touch 16GB | iPod Classic 160GB Silver |
| Type | Portable Media Player | Portable Media Player |
| Capacity Approve [ 1 ] / Disapprove [ 0 ] | 16 GB | 160GB |
| Player Features Approve [ 0 ] / Disapprove [ 0 ] | Playlists, Suffle, Repeat, Coverflow, Multi-touch interface | Playlists, Shuffle, Repeat |
| Product Line Approve [ 0 ] / Disapprove [ 0 ] | iPod Touch | iPod Classic |
| Release Date Approve [ 0 ] / Disapprove [ 0 ] | September 5, 2007 | September 5, 2007 |
| Manufacturer | Apple | Apple |
User Comments
Dec 23, 2007 - 23:43
by teradome
If the Classic's Coverflow mode wasn't so janky, this might be a closer clash.
Reply
Dec 24, 2007 - 10:20
by stillmotion
I believe the Touch schools the Classic. Even though it has less memory, WiFi and Touchscreen! FTW!
Reply




